<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Debate for America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://debateforamerica.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://debateforamerica.com</link>
	<description>Politics and World Events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:39:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Faith: The Attack on Religion by Pendark</title>
		<link>http://debateforamerica.com/opinion/faith-the-attack-on-religion/comment-page-1#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Pendark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debateforamerica.com/?p=383#comment-27</guid>
		<description>After thought:

And it is also funny to me that the &quot;progressives&quot; who talk about how &quot;evil&quot; the Christians are to women, never want to talk about Islam. Anti-xtians don&#039;t want to talk about this: 
1. The Burqa Covers Up Abuse, 
2. The Burqa Justifies Sexual Assault on Women Who Don’t Wear It, 
3. Civic Participation is nil in Islamic females, 
4. Segregation of females from society is Discrimination, 
5. The Wearing of the Burqa is Enforced Through Violence, 
6. Girls as young as nine are married off to Islamic patriarchs, 
7. Girls are circumcised from as early as age 3, 
8. Girls as young as 4 have been prostituted to Imams visiting homes, 
9. Women are ritually stoned to death for casting their eyes in the wrong direction, 
10. Women can be gang raped in the town square if they are accused of sleeping with the wrong man. 

But flying spaghetti monster forbid that a Christian male actually provide for, respect, not abuse, and not rape his wife in exchange for asking her to subjugate herself and sink to the menial tasks of raising children or cooking meals, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After thought:</p>
<p>And it is also funny to me that the &#8220;progressives&#8221; who talk about how &#8220;evil&#8221; the Christians are to women, never want to talk about Islam. Anti-xtians don&#8217;t want to talk about this:<br />
1. The Burqa Covers Up Abuse,<br />
2. The Burqa Justifies Sexual Assault on Women Who Don’t Wear It,<br />
3. Civic Participation is nil in Islamic females,<br />
4. Segregation of females from society is Discrimination,<br />
5. The Wearing of the Burqa is Enforced Through Violence,<br />
6. Girls as young as nine are married off to Islamic patriarchs,<br />
7. Girls are circumcised from as early as age 3,<br />
8. Girls as young as 4 have been prostituted to Imams visiting homes,<br />
9. Women are ritually stoned to death for casting their eyes in the wrong direction,<br />
10. Women can be gang raped in the town square if they are accused of sleeping with the wrong man. </p>
<p>But flying spaghetti monster forbid that a Christian male actually provide for, respect, not abuse, and not rape his wife in exchange for asking her to subjugate herself and sink to the menial tasks of raising children or cooking meals, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ethics and Morals as They Relate to The Law by OWB</title>
		<link>http://debateforamerica.com/opinion/ethics-and-morals-as-they-relate-to-the-law/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>OWB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 12:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debateforamerica.com/?p=234#comment-9</guid>
		<description>“Do the ethics, morals and values of a society belong in the decisions of law?”  It simply cannot be otherwise!  Of course they &quot;belong&quot; there.  To pretend otherwise leads to frustration if not utter psychosis.
A slightly different way of saying what you just have is in terms of survival skills.  We have spent several generations now breeding out and teaching out the most basic of survival skills from our population, to the point that most do not have even a nugget of an instinct to survive much less the skills to make it happen.
I would submit that it is beyond unnatural for a species to artficially (and at great effort) eliminate it&#039;s own instict to survive.  Is perhaps the current trend of younger and younger children progreating be Mother Nature&#039;s way of reversing that trend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Do the ethics, morals and values of a society belong in the decisions of law?”  It simply cannot be otherwise!  Of course they &#8220;belong&#8221; there.  To pretend otherwise leads to frustration if not utter psychosis.<br />
A slightly different way of saying what you just have is in terms of survival skills.  We have spent several generations now breeding out and teaching out the most basic of survival skills from our population, to the point that most do not have even a nugget of an instinct to survive much less the skills to make it happen.<br />
I would submit that it is beyond unnatural for a species to artficially (and at great effort) eliminate it&#8217;s own instict to survive.  Is perhaps the current trend of younger and younger children progreating be Mother Nature&#8217;s way of reversing that trend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Sidebar on the Birth Certificate BS by Pendark</title>
		<link>http://debateforamerica.com/opinion/a-sidebar-on-the-birth-certificate-bs/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Pendark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 01:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debateforamerica.com/?p=195#comment-8</guid>
		<description>If the offered document is proven to bas presented, then I’d actually like to see apology from the Donald and his “Birther” buddies. And, isn’t it just a little funny to you, that the exact same bunch of people seem to be at the head of every one of these conspiracy theories?

And no amount of proof against all of the bullshit about planes actually being nissiles, pillars being cut, depth charges in the basement, fuel nor burning steel et al, has been enough to shut the mouths of the bat shit whack jobs. So no evidence will be enough on this.

Trump was a leading proponent of the “Bush lied and people died” bullshit too. He has only jumped ship to this issue for the press it brings. and even if Obama is proven unqualified and we go through the process to impeach, Clinton proves that impeachment means jack shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the offered document is proven to bas presented, then I’d actually like to see apology from the Donald and his “Birther” buddies. And, isn’t it just a little funny to you, that the exact same bunch of people seem to be at the head of every one of these conspiracy theories?</p>
<p>And no amount of proof against all of the bullshit about planes actually being nissiles, pillars being cut, depth charges in the basement, fuel nor burning steel et al, has been enough to shut the mouths of the bat shit whack jobs. So no evidence will be enough on this.</p>
<p>Trump was a leading proponent of the “Bush lied and people died” bullshit too. He has only jumped ship to this issue for the press it brings. and even if Obama is proven unqualified and we go through the process to impeach, Clinton proves that impeachment means jack shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Sidebar on the Birth Certificate BS by OWB</title>
		<link>http://debateforamerica.com/opinion/a-sidebar-on-the-birth-certificate-bs/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>OWB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 16:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debateforamerica.com/?p=195#comment-6</guid>
		<description>The problem with this entire issue is that the core problem remains, and has in fact become even more relevant that it was originally, getting worse each day which passes.

The prez was not forthcoming with proof of his &quot;natural born&quot; status at the time waaaay back in 2008 when our Congress actually took up the issue of McCain&#039;s status in that regard because he was born on forign soil.  Sort of.  They affirmed that McCain actually is qualified to serve as the PotUS.  No one has yet shown us that Obama is.

He may or may not be - and that is the entire point.  He thumbed his nose at all us by offering an apparent forgery back when in the form of a short form CoLB.  Then refused to allow anyone to display any proof of his birth, spending big bucks to thwart every effort to see it.
I don&#039;t know why.  There may be no one left alive who knows, but I can only offer two suggestions as to why he would block our certain knowledge that he is qualified to serve - either there is something (who knows what) on his birth certificate that he does not want to share with us OR he is simply so arrogant that he will never willingly give us what we want just because he doesn&#039;t want to do it.
Either way, we still do not know if he is qualified to serve.  He probably is, but if not it is a Constitutional crisis of unimaginable proportions.  The whole mess  should have been settled before the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with this entire issue is that the core problem remains, and has in fact become even more relevant that it was originally, getting worse each day which passes.</p>
<p>The prez was not forthcoming with proof of his &#8220;natural born&#8221; status at the time waaaay back in 2008 when our Congress actually took up the issue of McCain&#8217;s status in that regard because he was born on forign soil.  Sort of.  They affirmed that McCain actually is qualified to serve as the PotUS.  No one has yet shown us that Obama is.</p>
<p>He may or may not be &#8211; and that is the entire point.  He thumbed his nose at all us by offering an apparent forgery back when in the form of a short form CoLB.  Then refused to allow anyone to display any proof of his birth, spending big bucks to thwart every effort to see it.<br />
I don&#8217;t know why.  There may be no one left alive who knows, but I can only offer two suggestions as to why he would block our certain knowledge that he is qualified to serve &#8211; either there is something (who knows what) on his birth certificate that he does not want to share with us OR he is simply so arrogant that he will never willingly give us what we want just because he doesn&#8217;t want to do it.<br />
Either way, we still do not know if he is qualified to serve.  He probably is, but if not it is a Constitutional crisis of unimaginable proportions.  The whole mess  should have been settled before the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Sharia Law Must Not Become an Affirmative Defense by Why Sharia Law Must Not Become an Affirmative Defense (Follow up) &#124; Debate for America</title>
		<link>http://debateforamerica.com/opinion/why-shariah-law-must-not-become-an-affirmative-defense/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Sharia Law Must Not Become an Affirmative Defense (Follow up) &#124; Debate for America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debateforamerica.com/?p=135#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] http://debateforamerica.com/opinion/why-shariah-law-must-not-become-an-affirmative-defense [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://debateforamerica.com/opinion/why-shariah-law-must-not-become-an-affirmative-defense" rel="nofollow">http://debateforamerica.com/opinion/why-shariah-law-must-not-become-an-affirmative-defense</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

